Harness AI achieved #2 spot on the SWE-Bench Verified leaderboard by autonomously solving real-world GitHub software issues, powering fast, reliable AI-assisted software delivery.
AI-assisted coding tools have dramatically increased the speed and quantity of code generation, yet software delivery remains a key bottleneck. While AI accelerates development, the real challenge lies in integrating, validating, and deploying code reliably. Without end-to-end automation, from code creation through delivery, the true impact of AI-generated code is delayed, highlighting the need for platforms that streamline the entire software lifecycle. That’s the problem we’re solving every day while building Harness AI.
That is why, today, we’re thrilled to announce that Harness AI’s code agent has climbed to #2 on the SWE‑Bench Verified leaderboard*, one of the most rigorous benchmarks for autonomous software engineering, taking us one step closer to building AI that is designed for everything after code generation.
*This blog post is part of our SWE‑Bench Verified submission. The final leaderboard screenshot will be updated once SWE‑Bench officially lists Harness AI on the public leaderboard.
SWE-bench is a benchmark for evaluating LLMs on real-world software issues collected from GitHub. SWE-bench Verified is its human-validated version. It tests AI’s real-world agentic coding skills, the kind required for coding tools like Cursor or Claude Code. Here’s the actual scenario:
500 real GitHub issues across production-grade Python repos. No hints. No scaffolding. Just raw code, and a single attempt.
To solve a task, an agent must:
Harness AI did exactly that, and it did it better than almost every other AI out there!
At the heart of Harness AI is a clean, modular architecture that mimics how real developers work, but with the speed and precision of AI.
We use Claude 4 in Thinking Mode, letting it reason deeply, generate step-by-step strategies, and revise plans on the fly. Unlike traditional prompting, “Thinking Mode” creates an internal monologue (a scratchpad), where the agent can brainstorm ideas, evaluate outcomes, and course-correct before taking action. This drastically reduces hallucinations and brittle plans.
SWE‑Bench doesn’t require fancy or complex tools. In most cases, simple file editing, shell execution, and structured planning are enough to solve tasks effectively.
All tool usage is guarded with better error handling, intelligent fallbacks, and timeouts. If a tool fails (e.g., a test command hangs or a grep query returns nothing), the agent doesn’t break; it adapts.
While we are proud of the results, we see it more as a signal. AI agents are no longer limited to toy coding problems or compiler tricks. They can now read real codebases, understand architecture, fix bugs, and prove it works.
We built Harness AI to tackle SWE‑Bench with precision, using just a few well-defined tools and sub-agents. That’s all the benchmark needed.
But enterprise-grade engineering problems go far beyond that. In real-world environments, AI agents must reason across systems, interact with external services, and collaborate with developers in dynamic workflows. That’s where Harness AI truly excels, with a scalable architecture, intelligent sub-agents, and advanced tools built for the complexity of modern software delivery.
Learn more about Harness AI’s capabilities across the SDLC.