Back
devops modernization

Harness CI

vs.

Jenkins

UPDATEd ON

13 Feb

2025

How does

Jenkins

compare?

While Jenkins is highly flexible and has a large plugin ecosystem, Harness CI appears to offer a more modern, user-friendly, and efficient approach to CI/CD, especially for organizations looking to reduce maintenance overhead and improve cloud-native capabilities.

Continuous Integration

Jenkins

Test Intelligence - Faster Builds Through Selective Test Execution

Test splitting

Caching software dependencies

Caching docker layers

Caching build tasks

Container & Cloud Native

Any Source Code Manager

Containerized Pipelines

Containerized Plug-ins

Custom Dashboards

Security Scanner Integrations - SAST, SCA

Deduplication of Scanner Results

Automated Prioritization of Vulnerabilities

SLSA L3 (v 1.0) - compliant build infrastructure

Pipeline-as-Code

Visual Pipeline Editor

Pipeline Templates

3rd Party Git Integrations

3rd Party CI Integrations

Secrets Management

Native Approvals

3rd Party Approvals (SNOW/Jira)

Policy-as-Code (OPA)

AI Guidance for Failure Remediation

Cloud-Agnostic

Support for Mobile Builds

No items found.

No items found.

No items found.

No items found.

No items found.

No items found.

No items found.

Next-generation CI/CD For Dummies

Stop struggling with tools—master modern CI/CD and turn deployment headaches into smooth, automated workflows.

Detailed feature comparison

  1. Ease of Use: Harness provides a more user-friendly and intuitive interface, making configuring and managing CI/CD pipelines easier than Jenkins' steeper learning curve.
  2. Maintenance: Harness is designed to be low-maintenance, while Jenkins often requires significant effort to scale and maintain long-term. Organizations typically need 2-5 engineers just to maintain Jenkins daily.
  3. Cloud-Native Design: Harness was built to be cloud-native, while Jenkins was not originally designed for cloud environments and requires additional configuration for cloud deployments.
  4. Scalability: Harness offers built-in autoscaling capabilities, allowing easier scaling of CI/CD infrastructure. Jenkins may require more manual configuration to achieve similar scalability.
  5. Security Features: Harness includes native secrets management and audit trails, while Jenkins requires additional plugins for these functionalities.
  6. Modern Architecture: Harness uses a more modern, container-based architecture, while Jenkins relies on older Java technologies.
  7. Pipeline Orchestration: Harness offers a graphical interface for defining complex workflows, making it easier to visualize and manage pipeline stages compared to Jenkins' code-based pipeline definitions.
  8. Native Cloud Support: Harness has built-in support for major cloud platforms, reducing the need for manual configuration.
  9. Adoption and Efficiency: In case studies like Qrvey, switching to Harness CI from Jenkins led to increased faster and more secure pipelines.
No items found.
Continuous Integration