Cloud costs
August 22, 2023
min read

Unit Testing vs. Integration Testing


Building software can be likened to the intricate art of constructing a car. Think of a car not just as a vehicle, but as a symphony of meticulously designed parts, each playing its own crucial role. Every part, whether it's a tiny bolt or a major component like the engine, is essential. Each one must be flawlessly crafted and stand resilient on its own. But the true magic happens when all these parts come together in a coordinated dance, working in unison to power the vehicle forward.

Drawing parallels in the software world, this is where unit testing and integration testing come into the spotlight. Much like examining each individual car part, unit testing delves deep into the specifics of each software component, ensuring its independent robustness. On the other hand, integration testing plays the role of the quality inspector, making certain that when these components are pieced together, they interact flawlessly, echoing that harmony we see in a well-oiled machine.

When visualizing the testing strategy for a software development project, one of the most commonly referenced models is the testing pyramid.

Testing pyramid

While diagrams can paint a neat picture, the real world of software testing is a bit messier. Imagine unit tests, integration tests, and other test categories as different tools in a toolkit. Just like a hammer and screwdriver serve different but complementary purposes, so do these testing methods.

Yes, developers sometimes engage in friendly debates about which test is superior. However, the true goal is to combine their strengths in our continuous integration pipelines. To do this well, it's crucial to really understand what each test brings to the table.

So, Unit Tests vs. Integration Tests. Let's dig deeper into each one and see how they contribute to producing quality software.

Checking Individual Components: Unit Testing

Unit testing is a method where individual parts of a software application, such as functions, methods, or classes, are tested in isolation. The objective is to ensure that each discrete component of the software functions as expected, verifying its logic, behavior, and outputs. By focusing on these smallest testable units, developers can identify and rectify issues at an early stage, ensuring that the foundation of the software is robust.

Within the realm of Test-Driven Development (TDD), the dynamics shift slightly but meaningfully. Here, unit tests aren't just subsequent validators but they lead the development process. These tests act like detailed blueprints, guiding the code that follows and making sure it meets set standards. This proactive approach helps reduce errors and encourages a more planned, forward-thinking development process.

One notable advantage of unit tests is their speed. Given their isolated nature, unit tests don't rely on external components or services to run. This makes them incredibly fast and an excellent choice for immediate feedback loops in development.

Ensuring Cohesive Functionality: Integration Testing

Once we've confirmed that each software piece works on its own, it's crucial to see how they connect and interact. This is where integration testing comes into play. Integration Tests enables you to verify the interactions between different parts or units of the software, ensuring the entire processes operate seamlessly.

However, compared to unit tests, integration tests are inherently more complex. They often require more setup, including background services, and provisioning dynamic test environments. As such, they tend to be slower than unit tests. This isn't a drawback per se but rather a characteristic that developers must be mindful of. While unit tests offer rapid feedback, integration tests provide a deeper assurance, validating the harmony between interconnected components.

Integration Testing vs. System Testing

While there are many other types of testing, a common question we see is what is the difference between Integration Testing and System Testing. System Testing is a higher-level testing phase that focuses on evaluating the entire software system as a whole. This phase examines whether the entire system meets the specified requirements and performs as expected in a real-world environment. System testing is usually performed after integration testing and considered a part of E2E testing.

The Value Of Automated Testing in CI/CD Pipelines

In today's fast-paced tech landscape, delivering software quickly isn't just a goal; it's a competitive advantage. Continuous integration (CI) and continuous delivery (CD) are established practices in software development that streamline the processes of building, testing, and deploying applications. Automated testing is an essential part of CI/CD pipelines. It can help to ensure that software is working as expected, and that it meets all of its requirements.

Here are some specific benefits of using automated testing in CI/CD pipelines:

  • Faster feedback: Automated tests can be run quickly and repeatedly, which allows for continuous feedback on the quality of the software. This can help to identify and fix bugs early, before they cause problems for users.
  • Reduced risk of defects: Automated tests can help to reduce the risk of defects in software by catching bugs early and often. By addressing issues upfront, you not only save time but also avoid costly fixes once the software is in production.
  • Improved quality: Automated testing can help to improve the quality of software by ensuring that it meets all of its requirements. This can lead to a better user experience and increased customer satisfaction.
  • Increased productivity: Automated testing can free up developers' time so that they can focus on more creative and strategic work. This can lead to increased productivity and a faster time to market for new features.

In Conclusion

In the journey of software development, every phase has its unique challenges and requirements. The importance of maintaining a high standard of quality remains a constant through all these phases. This is where practices like unit testing and integration testing shine, serving as invaluable checkpoints. By integrating these testing methods into CI/CD pipelines, we establish a consistent rhythm of evaluation and improvement, ensuring fast delivery of quality software.

Try Harness To Speed Up Your Test Cycles

Harness CI is the fastest CI solution on the market. Harness can help you cut your test cycle time by up to 80% with ML-based Test Intelligence. It identifies and runs only the tests relevant to your code changes so you only run tests that matter. Coupled with automatic tests splitting and concurrent tests execution, you'll experience faster builds, shorter feedback loops, and significant cost savings.

To experience how automated testing with Harness can speed up your software development and boost productivity, sign up for a free plan or request a demo today.

Sign up now

Sign up for our free plan, start building and deploying with Harness, take your software delivery to the next level.

Get a demo

Sign up for a free 14 day trial and take your software development to the next level


Learn intelligent software delivery at your own pace. Step-by-step tutorials, videos, and reference docs to help you deliver customer happiness.

Case studies

Learn intelligent software delivery at your own pace. Step-by-step tutorials, videos, and reference docs to help you deliver customer happiness.

We want to hear from you

Enjoyed reading this blog post or have questions or feedback?
Share your thoughts by creating a new topic in the Harness community forum.

Sign up for our monthly newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest Harness content in your inbox every month.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Continuous Integration